Skip to content

Best AI for SQL 2026

Database queries

Based on 11,902 user reviews
Updated on 2026-03-09
14 models ranked

🤖 Model Rankings(14)

Filter
1Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Anthropic
Samples
2,680
89

Anthropic's flagship model with 1M token context (now default), adaptive thinking, and the highest agentic coding scores. Introduced Agent Teams for parallel autonomous coding. Nearly doubled ARC-AGI-2 score over Opus 4.5 (68.8% vs 37.6%).

+ Highest SWE-bench score (80.8%)+ 128K max output (doubled from 4.5)2x price of GPT-5.4
2
M
MAI-Thinking-1
Microsoft
Samples
0
86

Microsoft's first in-house flagship reasoning model, unveiled at Build 2026. A ~35B active-parameter sparse Mixture-of-Experts model trained on commercially licensed data (Microsoft states it was trained without OpenAI data), with a 256K-token context window, function calling, and developer instruction support. Microsoft reports 97.0% on AIME 2025 and 94.5% on AIME 2026, and says it matches Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro while being preferred over Claude Sonnet 4.6 in blind side-by-side evaluations run by its human-rating partner Surge. Available in private preview through Microsoft Foundry, with availability announced for OpenRouter, Fireworks AI, and Baseten. Public pricing is not yet finalized, and the benchmark claims have not yet been independently reproduced.

+ Strong reported math reasoning (AIME 2025 97.0%, AIME 2026 94.5%)+ Microsoft says it matches Claude Opus 4.6 on SWE-Bench Pro for its weight classPrivate preview only at launch — limited access via Microsoft Foundry
3Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen 3.5
Alibaba (Qwen)
Samples
1,245
85

Alibaba's flagship open-source MoE model with 397B total parameters (17B active per pass). Apache 2.0 licensed for commercial use. Supports 201 languages with native vision capabilities. Best open-weight model for local deployment.

+ Open source (Apache 2.0)+ Self-hostable with vLLMWeaker on hard coding tasks vs Opus/GPT
4
N
Nex-N2-Pro
Nex AGI
Samples
0
85

Nex-N2-Pro is an open-weights agentic mixture-of-experts model from Nex AGI, with 17B active parameters out of 397B total, built on the Qwen3.5 architecture. It accepts text and image input and is tuned for long-horizon agentic work, frontier coding, and tool use, with a 262K-token context window. Released and open-sourced under Apache 2.0 on 2026-06-02. Reported benchmarks include SWE-Bench Verified 80.8, Terminal-Bench 2.1 75.3, GPQA Diamond 90.7, and BrowseComp 83.7 — strong among open-weights models, though it trails closed frontier models (GPT-5.5, Claude Opus 4.7) on most coding suites.

+ Open weights under permissive Apache 2.0 license — self-hostable and commercially usable+ Strong agentic & coding benchmarks for an open model (SWE-Bench Verified 80.8, Terminal-Bench 2.1 75.3)Trails closed frontier models (GPT-5.5, Opus 4.7) on most coding suites (SWE-Bench Pro 58.8 vs Opus 4.7 64.3)
5ByteDance
Doubao Seed 2.0 Code
ByteDance
Samples
760
84

ByteDance's coding-specialized model, deeply optimized for Agentic Programming. Delivers exceptional performance on Terminal Bench, SWE-Bench-Verified-Openhands, and Multi-SWE-Bench-Flash-Openhands. Native 256K context, first Chinese model with visual understanding for code. Compatible with Anthropic API, optimized for TRAE, Cursor, Cline, and Codex CLI.

+ Deeply optimized for Agentic Programming+ Codeforces 3020 (gold medalist level)Still trails Claude Opus 4.5 on SWE-Bench (76.5 vs 80.9)
6MiniMax
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax
Samples
856
82

MiniMax's self-evolving AI model with breakthrough agent capabilities. Demonstrates 30-50% autonomous RL research workflow. Excels at software engineering (SWE-Pro 56.22%), professional office tasks (GDPval-AA Elo 1495), and complex tool-calling with 97% skill adherence. Features significantly reduced hallucination (34% rate) and 20% fewer tokens than competitors.

+ Self-evolving RL capabilities (30-50% autonomous workflow)+ Extremely cheap ($0.30/1M input, $1.20/1M output)Proprietary model (weights not open source)
7MiniMax
MiniMax M3
MiniMax
Samples
0
82

MiniMax's next-generation multimodal foundation model, succeeding M2.7. Accepts text, image, and video inputs with text output and a 1M-token context window, built for long-horizon agentic work, coding, and long-context reasoning. Introduces 'MiniMax Sparse Attention' (MSA), with MiniMax-reported gains of 9.7x faster prefill and 15.6x faster decoding at 1M tokens versus M2.7. Priced at $0.30/1M input and $1.20/1M output. As of launch there are no independent third-party benchmark results yet.

+ 1M-token context window with native multimodal (text + image + video) input+ MiniMax-reported 15.6x faster decoding / 9.7x faster prefill at 1M tokens vs M2.7 (MiniMax Sparse Attention)No independent third-party benchmarks at launch — speedup figures are MiniMax-supplied only
8ByteDance
Doubao Seed 2.0 Pro
ByteDance
Samples
1,580
81

ByteDance's flagship foundation model, powering Doubao (China's #1 AI chatbot with 155M weekly users). Achieves frontier-level performance on math (AIME 98.3), coding (Codeforces 3020), and video understanding (VideoMME 89.5). Ranks 6th on LMSYS Text Arena and 3rd on Vision Arena. ~3.7x cheaper than GPT-5.2 on input, ~10x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.5.

+ Frontier math reasoning (AIME 98.3, IMO gold)+ Industry-leading video understanding (VideoMME 89.5)Code generation trails Claude Opus 4.5 (SWE-Bench 76.5 vs 80.9)
9ByteDance
Doubao Seed 2.0 Lite
ByteDance
Samples
1,120
79

ByteDance's balanced production model, optimizing for performance-cost tradeoff. MMLU-Pro 87.7 actually exceeds Pro variant. Near Pro-level Agent capabilities (WideSearch 74.5 vs 74.7). Ideal for enterprise chatbots, document processing, and general workloads at 80% lower cost than Pro.

+ Best performance-cost ratio in the family+ MMLU-Pro 87.7 exceeds Pro variantMath reasoning gap vs Pro (AIME 93 vs 98.3)
10MiniMax
MiniMax M2.5
MiniMax
Samples
1,245
78

MiniMax's flagship model with exceptional agentic capabilities at ultra-low cost. Demonstrates outstanding planning and stable execution of complex tool-calling tasks. One of the most capable AI agents available at a fraction of Claude/GPT pricing.

+ Extremely cheap ($0.20/1M input)+ Strong tool calling & function callingLess known in Western markets
11Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Anthropic
Samples
634
76

Anthropic's fastest model in the Claude 4.5 family. Optimized for quick responses and high-throughput applications. Default fast model in Claude Code. Excellent for simple coding tasks, quick Q&A, and cost-sensitive batch processing.

+ Fastest response in Claude family+ Affordable pricing ($1/$5 per MTok)Less capable than Sonnet/Opus for complex reasoning
12ByteDance
Doubao Pro (Legacy)
ByteDance
Samples
892
76

ByteDance's flagship AI model powering Doubao Phone Assistant. Deeply integrated with mobile OS for AI agent capabilities. Ultra-cheap API pricing makes it popular for OpenClaw users in China seeking 24/7 agent operation.

+ Ultra-cheap pricing ($0.15/1M input)+ Deep mobile OS integrationLimited availability outside China
13
M
MAI-Code-1-Flash
Microsoft
Samples
0
74

Microsoft's small, fast in-house coding model, unveiled at Build 2026 and built for GitHub Copilot. A ~5B-parameter model purpose-built to turn written descriptions into source code for apps and websites, with a 256K-token context window. Microsoft is rolling it out to a fraction of GitHub Copilot users in Visual Studio Code across the Free, Pro, Pro+, and Max plans, expanding over the coming weeks. The model card does not list a standalone launch API; GitHub pricing docs list $0.75/MTok input and $4.50/MTok output. Designed for low-latency, low-cost code generation rather than frontier reasoning.

+ Small (~5B) and fast — low-latency code generation+ Integrated directly into GitHub Copilot across all paid tiersSmall model — not built for complex reasoning or non-coding tasks
14ByteDance
Doubao Seed 2.0 Mini
ByteDance
Samples
890
72

ByteDance's high-throughput lightweight model for cost-sensitive batch processing. At $0.03/M input, it's ~58x cheaper than GPT-5.2 and makes million-document pipelines feasible. Supports 30K RPM and 1.5M TPM. Best for content moderation, classification, and high-concurrency chatbots.

+ Ultra-low cost ($0.03/M input, $0.31/M output)+ ~58x cheaper than GPT-5.2 on inputWeakest in family for complex reasoning

Want to compare two models?

Select any two models for a head-to-head comparison

Go to Compare