Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4
Comprehensive comparison between Meta's Llama 4 Maverick and OpenAI's GPT-5.4. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.
llama vs gptllama 4 vs gpt-5meta ai vs openaiopen source llm
Llama 4 Maverick
MetaMeta's flagship open-source multimodal model. 17B active parameters with 400B total (128 expert MoE). 1M context window, natively multimodal with early fusion. Extremely cost-effective at $0.15/$0.60 per M tokens. Supports 12 languages.
$0.15/$0.6per M tokens
Details GPT-5.4
OpenAIOpenAI's most capable and efficient frontier model for professional work. Combines industry-leading coding with native computer use, 1M+ context window, and improved reasoning. First GPT model to beat human performance on desktop navigation tasks.
$2.5/$15per M tokens
Details Specs Comparison
| Specification | Llama 4 Maverick | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 1049K | 1050K |
| Max Output | 16K | 128K |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $2.50 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $15.00 |
| Reasoning | ||
| Open Source |
Scenario Score Comparison
Coding
—
vs
94
Writing
—
vs
93
Llama 4 Maverick
Pros
- + Extremely affordable ($0.15/$0.60)
- + 1M context window
- + Native multimodal (text + image)
- + Open source (Llama 4 Community License)
- + High throughput MoE architecture
Cons
- − Coding performance below Claude/GPT
- − Benchmark gaming controversy
- − 16K max output limit
- − Knowledge cutoff August 2024
GPT-5.4
Pros
- + 1M+ context window (largest in GPT lineup)
- + Native computer use capability
- + 33% fewer hallucinations vs GPT-5.2
- + Tool search reduces tokens by 47%
- + Half the price of Claude Opus 4.6
Cons
- − 2x pricing above 272K tokens
- − 24% longer average responses (more output tokens)
- − Health benchmarks slightly worse than 5.2
- − Some users report benchmark-optimized feel
Recommendation
Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you:
- • Need extremely affordable ($0.15/$0.60)
- • Need 1m context window
- • Need native multimodal (text + image)
Choose GPT-5.4 if you:
- • Need 1m+ context window (largest in gpt lineup)
- • Need native computer use capability
- • Need 33% fewer hallucinations vs gpt-5.2
Based on scores across 2 scenarios, GPT-5.4 performs better overall.
Want to compare other models?
Custom Comparison