Llama 4 Maverick vs GPT-5.4

Comprehensive comparison between Meta's Llama 4 Maverick and OpenAI's GPT-5.4. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.

llama vs gptllama 4 vs gpt-5meta ai vs openaiopen source llm

Specs Comparison

SpecificationLlama 4 MaverickGPT-5.4
Context Window1049K1050K
Max Output16K128K
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$2.50
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$15.00
Reasoning
Open Source

Scenario Score Comparison

Coding
vs
94
Writing
vs
93

Llama 4 Maverick

Pros

  • + Extremely affordable ($0.15/$0.60)
  • + 1M context window
  • + Native multimodal (text + image)
  • + Open source (Llama 4 Community License)
  • + High throughput MoE architecture

Cons

  • Coding performance below Claude/GPT
  • Benchmark gaming controversy
  • 16K max output limit
  • Knowledge cutoff August 2024

GPT-5.4

Pros

  • + 1M+ context window (largest in GPT lineup)
  • + Native computer use capability
  • + 33% fewer hallucinations vs GPT-5.2
  • + Tool search reduces tokens by 47%
  • + Half the price of Claude Opus 4.6

Cons

  • 2x pricing above 272K tokens
  • 24% longer average responses (more output tokens)
  • Health benchmarks slightly worse than 5.2
  • Some users report benchmark-optimized feel

Recommendation

Choose Llama 4 Maverick if you:

  • Need extremely affordable ($0.15/$0.60)
  • Need 1m context window
  • Need native multimodal (text + image)

Choose GPT-5.4 if you:

  • Need 1m+ context window (largest in gpt lineup)
  • Need native computer use capability
  • Need 33% fewer hallucinations vs gpt-5.2

Based on scores across 2 scenarios, GPT-5.4 performs better overall.

Want to compare other models?

Custom Comparison