GPT-5.4 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro

Comprehensive comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.4 and Google's Gemini 3.1 Pro. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.

gpt 5.4 vs gemini 3.1latest ai models

Specs Comparison

SpecificationGPT-5.4Gemini 3.1 Pro
Context Window1050K1000K
Max Output128K66K
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$2.00
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$12.00
Reasoning
Open Source

Scenario Score Comparison

Coding
94
vs
85
Writing
93
vs
86

GPT-5.4

Pros

  • + 1M+ context window (largest in GPT lineup)
  • + Native computer use capability
  • + 33% fewer hallucinations vs GPT-5.2
  • + Tool search reduces tokens by 47%
  • + Half the price of Claude Opus 4.6

Cons

  • 2x pricing above 272K tokens
  • 24% longer average responses (more output tokens)
  • Health benchmarks slightly worse than 5.2
  • Some users report benchmark-optimized feel

Gemini 3.1 Pro

Pros

  • + Cheapest frontier model ($2/$12)
  • + Highest ARC-AGI-2 score (77.1%)
  • + Native multimodal (text/image/audio/video)
  • + 1M context window
  • + Free tier via AI Studio
  • + Best for frontend/web design

Cons

  • Weaker at agentic tasks
  • Context window issues reported
  • Sometimes skips lines in code edits
  • CLI/agent harness quality inconsistent

Recommendation

Choose GPT-5.4 if you:

  • Need 1m+ context window (largest in gpt lineup)
  • Need native computer use capability
  • Need 33% fewer hallucinations vs gpt-5.2

Choose Gemini 3.1 Pro if you:

  • Need cheapest frontier model ($2/$12)
  • Need highest arc-agi-2 score (77.1%)
  • Need native multimodal (text/image/audio/video)

Based on scores across 2 scenarios, GPT-5.4 performs better overall.

Want to compare other models?

Custom Comparison