GPT-5.4 vs Claude Opus 4.6

Comprehensive comparison between OpenAI's GPT-5.4 and Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.

gpt 5.4 vs claude opuslatest gpt vs claude

Specs Comparison

SpecificationGPT-5.4Claude Opus 4.6
Context Window1050K1000K
Max Output128K128K
Input (per 1M tokens)$2.50$5.00
Output (per 1M tokens)$15.00$25.00
Reasoning
Open Source

Scenario Score Comparison

Coding
94
vs
96
Writing
93
vs
91

GPT-5.4

Pros

  • + 1M+ context window (largest in GPT lineup)
  • + Native computer use capability
  • + 33% fewer hallucinations vs GPT-5.2
  • + Tool search reduces tokens by 47%
  • + Half the price of Claude Opus 4.6

Cons

  • 2x pricing above 272K tokens
  • 24% longer average responses (more output tokens)
  • Health benchmarks slightly worse than 5.2
  • Some users report benchmark-optimized feel

Claude Opus 4.6

Pros

  • + Highest SWE-bench score (80.8%)
  • + 128K max output (doubled from 4.5)
  • + Adaptive thinking with effort levels
  • + Agent Teams for parallel coding
  • + Best instruction following in complex contexts

Cons

  • 2x price of GPT-5.4
  • Response prefilling removed (breaking change)
  • 1M context in beta only
  • Extended thinking deprecated

Recommendation

Choose GPT-5.4 if you:

  • Need 1m+ context window (largest in gpt lineup)
  • Need native computer use capability
  • Need 33% fewer hallucinations vs gpt-5.2

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you:

  • Need highest swe-bench score (80.8%)
  • Need 128k max output (doubled from 4.5)
  • Need adaptive thinking with effort levels

Based on scores across 2 scenarios, both models perform equally well.

Want to compare other models?

Custom Comparison