Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemini 3 Pro
Comprehensive comparison between Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.5 and Google's Gemini 3 Pro. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.
claude vs geminianthropic vs google ai
Claude Opus 4.5
AnthropicAnthropic's flagship model, widely recognized as the top coding model. Excels at complex refactoring, large codebase comprehension, and agentic coding. Claude Code makes it the go-to choice for professional developers.
$5/$25per M tokens
Details Gemini 3 Pro
GoogleGoogle's comprehensive flagship with industry-leading 2M context window. HN users praise its strong multimodal processing and Google ecosystem integration. Some users believe it has surpassed OpenAI. Works well with Antigravity IDE.
$2/$12per M tokens
Details Specs Comparison
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemini 3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Context Window | 200K | 2000K |
| Max Output | 64K | 66K |
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $5.00 | $2.00 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $25.00 | $12.00 |
| Reasoning | ||
| Open Source |
Scenario Score Comparison
Coding
95
vs
84
Writing
90
vs
85
Translation
89
vs
91
Data Analysis
88
vs
89
Conversation
92
vs
88
Image Gen
75
vs
87
Research
92
vs
87
App Building
91
vs
84
Claude Opus 4.5
Pros
- + Top-tier coding ability
- + Highest code quality
- + Strong context understanding
- + Mature Claude Code ecosystem
Cons
- − Highest pricing ($15/1M input)
- − Average response speed
- − Strict quota limits
Gemini 3 Pro
Pros
- + 2M ultra-long context
- + Strong multimodal
- + Competitive pricing
- + Google ecosystem integration
Cons
- − Coding inferior to Claude
- − Slower response
- − API stability needs improvement
Recommendation
Choose Claude Opus 4.5 if you:
- • Need top-tier coding ability
- • Need highest code quality
- • Need strong context understanding
Choose Gemini 3 Pro if you:
- • Need 2m ultra-long context
- • Need strong multimodal
- • Need competitive pricing
Based on scores across 8 scenarios, Claude Opus 4.5 performs better overall.
Want to compare other models?
Custom Comparison