Skip to content

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.3-Codex

Comprehensive comparison between Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.6 and OpenAI's GPT-5.3-Codex. Compare pricing, performance, features, and user reviews.

best ai for codingclaude vs codex

Specs Comparison

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.3-Codex
Context Window1000K256K
Max Output128K64K
Input (per 1M tokens)$5.00$1.75
Output (per 1M tokens)$25.00$14.00
Reasoning
Open Source

Scenario Score Comparison

Coding
96
vs
93
Writing
91
vs
—
Translation
—
vs
65
Data Analysis
—
vs
78
Conversation
—
vs
60
Image Gen
—
vs
50

Claude Opus 4.6

Pros

  • + Highest SWE-bench score (80.8%)
  • + 128K max output (doubled from 4.5)
  • + Adaptive thinking with effort levels
  • + Agent Teams for parallel coding
  • + Best instruction following in complex contexts

Cons

  • − 2x price of GPT-5.4
  • − Response prefilling removed (breaking change)
  • − Extended thinking deprecated
  • − Rate limits can be hit quickly on entry-level plans

GPT-5.3-Codex

Pros

  • + Coding-optimized
  • + Great value
  • + Generous quotas
  • + SWE-bench leader

Cons

  • − Text-only
  • − Weak at creative tasks
  • − Requires Codex-specific API

Recommendation

Choose Claude Opus 4.6 if you:

  • • Need highest swe-bench score (80.8%)
  • • Need 128k max output (doubled from 4.5)
  • • Need adaptive thinking with effort levels

Choose GPT-5.3-Codex if you:

  • • Need coding-optimized
  • • Need great value
  • • Need generous quotas

Based on scores across 6 scenarios, GPT-5.3-Codex performs better overall.

Get Started with Claude Opus 4.6

2Choose Pro ($20/mo) for Opus access
3Start chatting or try Claude Code

💡 Free tier uses Sonnet. Upgrade to Pro for Opus.

Get Started with GPT-5.3-Codex

1Visit the provider's website
2Create an account
3Start using the model

Want to compare other models?

Custom Comparison